On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Pekka J Enberg wrote: > Yes and that's what we have been saying all along. When you want > performance, you use SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN and let the allocator do its job. > I don't see much point from API point of view for the caller to explicitly > ask for a given alignment and then in addition pass a 'yes I really meant' > flag (SLAB_DEBUG_OVERRIDE). Btw, /proc/slabinfo for UML with defconfig reveals change for only one cache with my patch applied. The 'dquot' cache is created by dquot_init in fs/dquot.c and doesn't really seem to need the alignment for anything... Pekka - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [patch] slab: always follow arch requested alignments
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] slab: always follow arch requested alignments
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] slab: always follow arch requested alignments
- From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
- [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
- From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
- From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
- From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
- From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
- From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
- From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
- From: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
- From: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
- From: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
- From: Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
- From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] slab: always follow arch requested alignments
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ncpfs: move ioctl32 code to fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c
- Next by Date: Re: [BUG?] possible recursive locking detected
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 2/2] slab: always consider arch mandated alignment
- Index(es):
 |