Re: reference: ncpfs: move ioctl32 code to fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c

On Thursday 27 July 2006 03:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Ok, I just realized that this was not using a merged 
> ->compat_ioctl/->unlocked_ioctl function yet, but wth, here
> it is anyway.
> 
Oh well, couldn't resist doing the complete patch now...

Petr, you can find the thread at http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/10/49

	Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch/rfc] s390: get rid of own uid16 compat system calls
    • From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch/rfc] s390: get rid of own uid16 compat system calls
    • From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
  • reference: ncpfs: move ioctl32 code to fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c
    • From: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 6)
• Next by Date: [PATCH] ncpfs: move ioctl32 code to fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c
• Previous by thread: reference: ncpfs: move ioctl32 code to fs/ncpfs/ioctl.c
• Next by thread: reference: smbfs: simplify compat_ioctl handling
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]