Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2

On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:23:03 +0300, Al Boldi said:

> Running different scheds on a single RQ at the same time on the same resource
> would be rather odd.  That's why independent RQs are necessary even on SMP.
> OTOH, running independent RQs on UP doesn't make much sense, unless there is
> a way to relate them.

Exactly..

(But now I'm confused why you said SMP and UP were conceptually the same a
few notes back...)

Attachment: pgpBvM9aENwYf.pgp
Description: PGP signature

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
    • From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
    • From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
    • From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
    • From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
  • Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
    • From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH V2] reference rt-mutex-design in rtmutex.c
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] slab: always follow arch requested alignments
• Previous by thread: Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
• Next by thread: Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]