Re: [patch] slab: always follow arch requested alignments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> Hi Heiko,
> 
> On 7/22/06, Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Sorry, I should have mentioned it: on s390 (32 bit) we set
> > #define ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN 8.
> > This is needed since our common I/O layer allocates data structures that
> > need
> > to have an eight byte alignment. Now, if I turn on DEBUG_SLAB, nothing works
> > anymore, simply because the slab cache code ignores ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN
> > and
> > uses an BYTES_PER_WORD alignment instead, which it shouldn't:
> 
> This is the bit I missed, sorry. I thought that the s390 hardware
> mandates 8 byte alignment, but it really doesn't. So you're absolutely
> right, you don't need to set ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN and the alignment
> calculation in slab is indeed broken for both, architecture and caller
> mandated alignments.

Well that is a bit far reaching. What is broken is that SLAB_RED_ZONE and
SLAB_STORE_USER ignore any given alignment. If you want to fix that then 
you need to modify how both debugging methods work.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux