Re: [PATCH] TIF_NOTSC and SECCOMP prctl

* [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

> Here a repost of the last seccomp patch against current mainline 
> including the preempt fix. This changes the seccomp API from 
> /proc/<pid>/seccomp to a prctl (this will produce a smaller kernel) 
> and it adds a TIF_NOTSC that seccomp sets. Only the current task can 
> call disable_TSC (obviously because it hasn't a task_t param). This 
> includes Chuck's patch to give zero runtime cost to the notsc feature.

please send a patch-queue that is properly split-up: the bugfix, the API 
change and the TIF_NOTSC improvement.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] TIF_NOTSC and SECCOMP prctl
  - From: [email protected]

References:
- Re: [PATCH] TIF_NOTSC and SECCOMP prctl
  - From: Chuck Ebbert <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] TIF_NOTSC and SECCOMP prctl
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: [PATCH] TIF_NOTSC and SECCOMP prctl
  - From: [email protected]

Prev by Date: [BUG] usb: device unconnect cause oops
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -rt] Don't let raise_softirq_prio lower the prio (was: [RT] rt priority losing)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] TIF_NOTSC and SECCOMP prctl
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] TIF_NOTSC and SECCOMP prctl
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]