Re: [PATCH] CCISS: Don't print driver version until we actually find a device

["Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>]

On 26/07/06, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 July 2006 16:47, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 00:43 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > On 26/07/06, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> wrote:
> > > > If we don't find any devices, we shouldn't print anything.
> > > >
> > > I disagree.
> > > I find it quite nice to be able to see that the driver loaded even if
> > > it finds nothing. At least then when there's a problem, I can quickly
> > > see that at least it is not because I didn't forget to load the
> > > driver, it's something else. Saves time since I can start looking for
> > > reasons why the driver didn't find anything without first spending
> > > additional time checking if I failed to cause it to load for some
> > > reason.
> >
> > I'll add a second reason: it is a REALLY nice property to be able to see
> > which driver is started last in case of a crash/hang, so that the guilty
> > party is more obvious..
>
> initcall_debug is a more reliable way to find that.  Do you want
> all drivers to print something in their init function?

It's not my call, but that would be my personal preference, yes.


--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/