On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 01:50:52PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Neil Horman wrote:
> >
> >Agreed. How about we take the /dev/rtc patch now (since its an added
> >feature
> >that doesn't hurt anything if its not used, as far as tickless kernels
> >go), and
> >I'll start working on doing gettimeofday in vdso for arches other than
> >x86_64.
> >That will give the X guys what they wanted until such time until all the
> >other
> >arches have a gettimeofday alternative that doesn't require kernel traps.
> >
>
> It hurts if it DOES get used.
>
Yes, but if its in trade for something thats being used currently which hurts
more (case in point being the X server), using this solution is a net gain.
I'm not arguing with you that adding a low res gettimeofday vsyscall is a better
long term solution, but doing that requires potentially several implementations
in the C library accross a range of architectures, some of which may not be able
to provide a time solution any better than what the gettimeofday syscall
provides today. The /dev/rtc solution is easy, available right now, and applies
to all arches. It has zero impact for systems which do not use it, and for
those applications which make a decision to use it instead of an alternate
method, the result I expect will be a net gain, until such time as we code up,
test and roll out a vsyscall solution
Thanks & Regards
Neil
> -hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
