On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:20:40 PDT, Andrew Morton said: > That would appear to imply that nobody has used freevxfs in four years. Given that... > I don't see anything in there which needs the locking, apart from perhaps > f_pos updates. But it's probably best to add the lock_kernel() - this is a > bugfixing exercise, not a remove-BKL-from-freevxfs exercise. Should we consider a remove-freevxfs-from-kernel exercise?
Attachment:
pgpBP2W5cBHvH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Typo in ub clause of devices.txt
- Next by Date: Re: Typo in ub clause of devices.txt
- Previous by thread: Re: vxfs_readdir locking incorrect: add lock_kernel() or remove unlock_kernel()?
- Next by thread: What is the difference between sk_wmem_queued & sk_wmem_alloc ?
- Index(es):
 |