Re: [RFC PATCH] Multi-threaded device probing

[Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>]

On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 01:09:53AM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 01:30:28PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > This adds the infrastructure for drivers to do a threaded probe.
> 
> > -			goto ProbeFailed;
> > +			goto probe_failed;
> >  		}
> >  	} else if (drv->probe) {
> >  		ret = drv->probe(dev);
> >  		if (ret) {
> >  			dev->driver = NULL;
> > -			goto ProbeFailed;
> > +			goto probe_failed;
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  	device_bind_driver(dev);
> >  	ret = 1;
> >  	pr_debug("%s: Bound Device %s to Driver %s\n",
> >  		 drv->bus->name, dev->bus_id, drv->name);
> > -	goto Done;
> > +	goto done;
> >  
> > - ProbeFailed:
> > +probe_failed:
> >  	if (ret == -ENODEV || ret == -ENXIO) {
> >  		/* Driver matched, but didn't support device
> >  		 * or device not found.
> > @@ -110,7 +99,53 @@ int driver_probe_device(struct device_dr
> >  		       "%s: probe of %s failed with error %d\n",
> >  		       drv->name, dev->bus_id, ret);
> >  	}
> > - Done:
> > +done:
> 
> Removing these changes will make this patch smaller and do one thing. ;-)

Heh, yeah, it would, but cleaning up coding style violations at the same
time that I move code around is usually safe :)

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/