Joshua Hudson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 7/24/06, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:45:45 +0400, Nikita Danilov said:
> > > Joshua Hudson writes:
> > > > In my filesystem, any attempt to create a loop of hard links
> > > > is detected and cancelled.
> > >
> > > Can you elaborate a bit on this exciting mechanism? Obviously an ability
> > > to efficiently detect loops would be a break-through in a
> > > reference-counted garbage collection, somehow missed for last 40
> > It's actually pretty trivial to do if it's a toy filesystem and all the
> > relevant inodes are in-memory already. The hard-to-solve part is getting
> > around the (apparent) need to walk across essentially the entire tree
> > structure making sure that you aren't creating a loop. This can get
> > rather performance piggy - even /home on my laptop has some 400K
> > inodes on it, and a 'find /home -type d' takes 28 seconds. That's a *long*
> > time to lock and freeze a filesystem.
> Actually, I walk from the source inode down to try to find the
> target inode. If not found, this is not attempting to create a loop.
> Should be obvious that the average case is much less than the
> whole tree.
You have to consider the worst case... and /that/ one is very bad.
> > Where it gets *really* messy is that it isn't just mkdir that's the
> > problem - once you let there be more than one path from the fs root to
> > a given directory, it gets *really* hard to make sure that any given
> > 'mv' command isn't going to to screw things up (is 'mv a/b/c/d
> > ../../w/z/b' safe? How do you know, without examining a *lot* of stuff
> > under a/ and ../../w/?
> mv /a/b/c/d ../../w/z/b is implemented as this in the filesystem:
> ln /a/b/c/d ../../w/z/b && rm /a/b/c/d
>
> So what it's going to do is try to find z under /a/b/c/d.
What if the ln(1) creates a loop, that the rm(1) then breaks? I.e., move a
directory nearer to the root?
Also note that with your idea '..' becomes ambiguous, as w might have
/lots/ of parents here.
> Oh, and Nakita's right about the NFS server stuff. Actually, I think
> the current filesystem I use for this is totally incompatible with
> NFS (cannot call d_splice_alias on directory dnodes) so that
> doesn't concern me.
Anything that isn't even NFS-capable is almost useless, IMVHO. Unless you
come up with a successor to NFS in tandem, that is.
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
