Chuck Ebbert wrote:
The cleaner fix looks more intrusive, though.
Is this simpler change (what I'm running but without the warning
messages) the preferred fix for -stable?
It fixes the problem.
The ugly thing about that patch is adding
another TTY_XXX macro that is not really necessary.
I created it as a quick and dirty way of testing
my hypothesis about the problem.
I don't see a problem using it as a simple
(albeit naive) approach to fix stable.
--
Paul Fulghum
Microgate Systems, Ltd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
