Jeff Garzik wrote:
The patch should contain ONE logical change.
Definitely yes. The problem is to figure out what "one" is.
I already posted what I considered one logical change in this case and
why I did: It's an idiomatic makeover of k*alloc calls without change in
functionality. What breaks my counting of "one" is that unwritten rules
about preferred idioms (are said to) override written rules.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-==- -=== =-==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
