Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 3)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[email protected] wrote:
* changed back the version-checking when defining bool, this since I'm quite
sure Linux 2.4 and 2.6 share (if not all, then large part of) the drivers. And
2.4 is still compiled with the 2.95 Gcc.

Drivers in 2.4 and 2.6 differ. We don't put 2.4-compatibility code into 2.6. And the bool type won't get into 2.4.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-==- -=== =-==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux