Re: [PATCH] drivers: Conversions from kmalloc+memset to k(z|c)alloc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesper Juhl wrote:
On 21/07/06, Stefan Richter <[email protected]> wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> On 7/21/06, Rolf Eike Beer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > - if (!(handle = kmalloc(sizeof(struct input_handle), GFP_KERNEL)))
>>> > +     handle = kzalloc(sizeof(struct input_handle), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> > +     if (!handle)
>>> >               return NULL;
>>>
>>> sizeof(*handle)?
>>
>> In general, yes. However, some maintainers don't like that, so I would
>> recommend to keep them as-is unless you get a clear ack from the
>> maintainer to change it.

I suggest:
 - check if "sizeof(type)"->"sizeof(*ptr)" is correct
 - if yes, change it
[snip]
 - better style of the size argument where correct,

Who says it's "better style" ?
You can argue that   sizeof(type) is more readable.
When reading the code you don't have to go lookup the type of ptr in
sizeof(*ptr)  before you know what type the code is working with.

All the more reason that such changes -- unrelated to kzalloc/kcalloc conversion -- should be in a separate patch.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux