parport: small addition to Documentation/parport-lowlevel.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



A small note inserted, regarding usage of the parport_unregister_driver interface.

Only a single file Documentation/parport-lowlevel.txt is affected (pulled from 2.6.18-rc2 :
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;h=8f2302415eff90b0df7aa655f132f9567ff9ccd7;hb=82d6897fefca6206bca7153805b4c5359ce97fc4;f=Documentation/parport-lowlevel.txt
)

Came across this "issue" while writing a parport-based driver.
Does this make sense?

- Kaiwan.

---
--- parport-lowlevel.vanilla    2006-07-21 18:25:24.000000000 +0530
+++ parport-lowlevel    2006-07-21 18:34:52.000000000 +0530
@@ -258,6 +258,18 @@
       ...
}

+Note-
+If you are using this interface in the "usual" way, you are probably first
+registering your driver with parport_register_driver and unregistering with
+parport_unregister_driver (as shown in the "lp_driver" example about a page
+up from here). You will have attach and detach function callbacks.
+The point is: when your driver is removed from the kernel, your
+cleanup_module function is invoked, which typically invokes
+parport_unregister_driver. This will cause the detach function to kick in.
+Now, this guy should _not_ be (re)invoking parport_unregister_driver, but
+just parport_unregister_device as necessary.
+
+
SEE ALSO

parport_register_driver, parport_enumerate

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux