Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean

[email protected] wrote:

Citerar Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>:

Please, show compiler flag[s] to enable warning[s] from gcc about

	_Bool foo = 42;

Until you do that the whole activity is moot.

On it...

Would not the compiler treat 42 as a Boolean expression (as opposed to an integer expression) that evaluates to true and set foo accordingly. I.e. there's only a problem here if foo ends up with the value 42 instead of the value true.

Peter
--
Peter Williams                                   [email protected]

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
 -- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
    • From: [email protected]

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] doc: pci_module_init() removal
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sound: Conversions from kmalloc+memset to k(z|c)alloc.
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]