Re: Per-user swap devices.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[email protected] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 10:54:38 BST, Ian Stirling said:

It would be really nice to be able to simply: chown crashalot.users /dev/swap0 ;swapon /dev/swap0
Then anything run by crashalot would swap to /dev/swap0 - and not locally.

This doesn't look like it will do as much good as you think.  The problem
is what to do when something run by some *other* UID needs a page - you need
to fix the code to preferentially steal a page from a 'crashalot' process.

And at that point, what you probably want instead is a global per-UID RSS
limit.  This looks like a job for a CKRM resource class controller rather than
a hack to the swap code.

Not quite.
I've got one set of users that I care about their processes never dying
root, ..., and another set that I don't.

I want them to contend for real RAM as normal - it's quite acceptible to me for users in the second group to push root/...s web-proxy, screen session, processes far into slow local swap. Most of these processes will be not very interactive - but I don't want them to die.

If the fast (but unreliable) swap device dies - I'm quite happy for my firefox and mplayer processes to die - but not my window manager or whatever. RSS limits don't address this.

The only way I can think of to address this is to somehow segregate swap devices.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux