Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel-doc: ignore __devinit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel-doc: ignore __devinit
From: Martin Waitz <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:00:19 +0200
Cc: lkml <[email protected]>, akpm <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Mail-followup-to: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>, lkml <[email protected]>, akpm <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

hoi :)

On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 02:32:35PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
> 
> Ignore __devinit in function definitions so that kernel-doc won't
> fail on them.

why would it fall over __devinit?
And shouldn't we add __{dev}?init{data}? while we are at it?

-- 
Martin Waitz

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel-doc: ignore __devinit
  - From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 1/3] kernel-doc: ignore __devinit
  - From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Reiser4 ACLs
Next by Date: Re: Generic B-tree implementation
Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/3] kernel-doc: ignore __devinit
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kernel-doc: ignore __devinit
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux