On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:30:04 +0200, Jesper Juhl said: > Claiming anything send by email is confidential seems completely > rediculous to me. There actually *is* a valid usage case for these disclaimers in *some* cases. If there *is* in fact material covered by lawyer-client or similar privilege, having the disclaimer on *those items alone* can do some good when the other side's legal eagles subpoena all e-mails with the phrase 'Project Wombat' in them - it puts the other side on notice that they shouldn't be looking at that item and it should be returned. It's the same legal theory as subpoenaing all the paper documents, and finding in the 53 boxes, a sheet stamped 'Privileged and Confidential' that accidentally got into box 27 - there's strict rules about what happens then. Of course, paper documents are stamped on the TOP so you stop reading, and not all of them are stamped... :) (And I actually did at one time have dealings with a lawyer who Actually Got It. E-mails re: scheduling and other administrivia didn't have a disclaimer, stuff that was actually sensitive had a very short one at the *top*...) > Perhaps if the email was encrypted I could attach some weight to a > disclaimer like thatt, but sending unencrypted email is like writing on > the back of a postcard - it can be read by a huge number of people in > transit - admins managing the mail servers where it is stored along > the way, people sniffing traffic on the lines it passes through, At least in the US, the law says otherwise. 18 USC 2511 basically says that the admins aren't allowed to blab, and the traffic sniffers are committing a crime already. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002511----000-.html And if you catch them at it, 18 USC 2520 says you can sue them for damages: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00002520----000-.html
Attachment:
pgphmZYgVChzN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] Vacation message heckling (Was: Re: Richard Dent - Annual Leave)
- From: Craig Van Tassle <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] Vacation message heckling (Was: Re: Richard Dent - Annual Leave)
- References:
- Richard Dent - Annual Leave
- From: Dent Richard (East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust) <[email protected]>
- [OT] Vacation message heckling (Was: Re: Richard Dent - Annual Leave)
- From: Thomas Tuttle <[email protected]>
- Re: [OT] Vacation message heckling (Was: Re: Richard Dent - Annual Leave)
- From: "Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]>
- Richard Dent - Annual Leave
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 2/3] pci/search: cleanups, add to kernel-api.tmpl
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc1-mm2
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Vacation message heckling (Was: Re: Richard Dent - Annual Leave)
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] Vacation message heckling (Was: Re: Richard Dent - Annual Leave)
- Index(es):