This replaces the previous patch.
Thanks,
Kylie
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 14:04 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 11:35:20AM -0700, Kylene Jo Hall wrote:
> > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > From: Kylene Jo Hall <kjhall@us.ibm.com>
> > To: linux-os (Dick Johnson) <linux-os@analogic.com>
> > Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, TPM Device Driver List
> > <tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, akpm@osdl.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: interrupt clear fix
> > Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 12:24:36 -0700
> > Under stress testing I found that the interrupt is not always cleared.
> > This is a bug and this patch should go into 2.6.18 and 2.6.17.x.
> >
> > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 07:45 -0400, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:
> >
> > > PCI devices need a final read to flush all pending writes. Whatever
> > > mb() does, just hides the problem.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kylene Hall <kjhall@us.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.18-rc1/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c 2006-07-13 14:46:39.727500500 -0500
> > +++ linux-2.6.18-rc1-tpm/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c 2006-07-13 14:47:33.878884750 -0500
> > @@ -424,6 +424,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tis_int_handler(int i
> > iowrite32(interrupt,
> > chip->vendor.iobase +
> > TPM_INT_STATUS(chip->vendor.locality));
> > + ioread32(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_INT_STATUS(chip->vendor.locality));
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
>
> So does this replace the other tpm patch? Or should we apply both of
> them?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]