[patch 10/45] Reduce ACPI verbosity on null handle condition

[Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>]

-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------
From: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>

As detailed at http://bugs.gentoo.org/131534 :

2.6.16 converted many ACPI debug messages into error or warning 
messages. One extraneous message was incorrectly converted, resulting in 
logs being flooded by "Handle is NULL and Pathname is relative" messages 
on some systems.

This patch (part of a larger ACPICA commit) converts the message back to 
debug level.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
 drivers/acpi/namespace/nsxfeval.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- linux-2.6.17.3.orig/drivers/acpi/namespace/nsxfeval.c
+++ linux-2.6.17.3/drivers/acpi/namespace/nsxfeval.c
@@ -238,8 +238,9 @@ acpi_evaluate_object(acpi_handle handle,
 			ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
 				    "Both Handle and Pathname are NULL"));
 		} else {
-			ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO,
-				    "Handle is NULL and Pathname is relative"));
+			ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO,
+					  "Null Handle with relative pathname [%s]",
+					  pathname));
 		}
 
 		status = AE_BAD_PARAMETER;

--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/