Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!

On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:30:08AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> Jochen, you didn't say whether or not the 2.6.18-rc2 locked up. I'm
> assuming it did. But did it?

Hi Steven,

no, it did not lock up yet but I did not do any "serious" webbrowsing
with 2.6.18-rc2 so far.

Best regards,

   Jochen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
    • From: Jochen Heuer <[email protected]>

• References:
  • BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
    • From: Jochen Heuer <[email protected]>
  • Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: kernel panic at load average of 24 is it acceptable ?
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: fix handling of device names with /'s in them
• Previous by thread: Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
• Next by thread: Re: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]