Gerrit Renker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> diff -Nurp a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> --- a/net/core/sock.c 2006-07-06 09:08:24.000000000 +0100
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c 2006-07-14 10:17:50.000000000 +0100
> @@ -479,7 +479,12 @@ set_rcvbuf:
> break;
>
> case SO_NO_CHECK:
> - sk->sk_no_check = valbool;
> + /* UDP-Lite (RFC 3828) mandates checksumming,
> + * hence user must not enable this option. */
> + if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_UDPLITE)
> + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + else
> + sk->sk_no_check = valbool;
Please don't add protocol-specific stuff to generic functions. In this
case why don't you just ignore sk_no_check for UDPLITE as we do for TCP?
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]