cpufreq_ondemand governor - problem

["art" <art@usfltd.com>]

problem:
on dualcore AMD - if you use cpufreq_ondemand governor and your program is 
one_process/one_thread intensive one core is busy and second is doing 
nothing - governor is droping speed on both cores to lowest speed - slowing 
down busy core process - my dualcore-AMD do this i'm not shure if it is only 
AMD or INTEL problem too 

to test this set ondemand governor 

# echo "ondemand" > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor 

now
start in terminal-1 

#awk 'BEGIN {for(i=0;i<100000;i++)for(j=0;j<100000;j++);}' 

observe cpu speed and utilization
core1 - utilization 100% speed lowest possible
core2 - utilization 0% speed lowest possible 

now
start in terminal-2 

#awk 'BEGIN {for(i=0;i<100000;i++)for(j=0;j<100000;j++);}' 

observe cpu speed and utilization
core1 - utilization 100% speed max possible
core2 - utilization 100% speed max possible 

now kill one awk 

observe cpu speed and utilization
core1 - utilization 100% speed lowest possible
core2 - utilization 0% speed lowest possible 

looks like cpufreq ondemand governor sets two frequency dependent cores to 
speed level ok for that one with lowest utilization slowing down 
process/thread working on other core. For now it is ok for independent 
multiprocessor bad for multicore-freq-dependent. 


temporary dirty patch works for me - your result my vary (for shure it will 
not work for multi-processor/dualcore - we need identify and pair cores to 
do same thing) 


--- cpufreq_ondemand.c-org	2006-07-05 23:09:49.000000000 -0500
+++ cpufreq_ondemand.c	2006-07-14 15:50:56.000000000 -0500
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
 * All times here are in uS.
 */
static unsigned int def_sampling_rate;
+static unsigned int load_max_core=0;
#define MIN_SAMPLING_RATE_RATIO			(2)
/* for correct statistics, we need at least 10 ticks between each measure 
*/
#define MIN_STAT_SAMPLING_RATE			(MIN_SAMPLING_RATE_RATIO * 
jiffies_to_usecs(10))
@@ -268,6 +269,8 @@ static void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpu_dbs
			idle_ticks = tmp_idle_ticks;
	}
	load = (100 * (total_ticks - idle_ticks)) / total_ticks;
+	if (load_max_core > load)
+		load = load_max_core;

	/* Check for frequency increase */
	if (load > dbs_tuners_ins.up_threshold) {
@@ -297,6 +300,7 @@ static void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpu_dbs

		__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq_next, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
	}
+load_max_core = 0;
}

static void do_dbs_timer(void *data) 


--------------------------------------------------- 

after this patch dualcore-AMD is working OK max speed for 100% utilization 
on core1 and 0% utilization on core2 


xboom
art@usfltd.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/