Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.17.3 (What is the next step?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Justin Piszcz wrote:
They are Western Digital 400* drives.

[4294678.049000]   Vendor: ATA       Model: WDC WD4000KD-00N  Rev: 01.0
[4294678.050000]   Vendor: ATA       Model: WDC WD4000KD-00N  Rev: 01.0

On a SiL controller, it also happens when they are on a promise controller too.

On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Mark Lord wrote:

Justin Piszcz wrote:

opcode=0x35 & opcode=0xca

Those are non-DMA WRITE opcodes. Using PIO for I/O is pretty rare these days,
so I'm betting that this is not a hard disk device -- compactflash?

Okay.  So why are we issuing PIO WRITE commands to drives that
obviously should only be sent DMA commands by libata?

Perhaps that's the bug.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux