Re: [PATCH] remove volatile from nmi.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:

diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c b/arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c
index 2dd928a..eb8bbbb 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/nmi.c
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 */
static __init void nmi_cpu_busy(void *data)
{
-	volatile int *endflag = data;
+	int *endflag = data;
	local_irq_enable_in_hardirq();
	/* Intentionally don't use cpu_relax here. This is
	   to make sure that the performance counter really ticks,
@@ -121,10 +121,14 @@ #endif

static int __init check_nmi_watchdog(void)
{
-	volatile int endflag = 0;
+	static int endflag = 0;

Now that this is static, isn't this a candidate for __initdata?

	unsigned int *prev_nmi_count;
	int cpu;

+	/* Have we done this already? */
+	if (endflag)
+		return 0;
+
	if (nmi_watchdog == NMI_NONE)
		return 0;


Thanks,
Chase
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux