On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 11:50 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Why isn't the "on_slab_key" local to just the init_lock_keys() > function, > and the #ifdef around it all? it's the same net results; the variable is 0 bytes in size for !LOCKDEP - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] lockdep: annotate mm/slab.c
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] lockdep: annotate mm/slab.c
- References:
- Random panics seen in 2.6.18-rc1
- From: Chandra Seetharaman <[email protected]>
- Re: Random panics seen in 2.6.18-rc1
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Random panics seen in 2.6.18-rc1
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: Random panics seen in 2.6.18-rc1
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: Random panics seen in 2.6.18-rc1
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [patch] lockdep: annotate mm/slab.c
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] lockdep: annotate mm/slab.c
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Random panics seen in 2.6.18-rc1
- Prev by Date: Re: utrace vs. ptrace
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Kernel memory leak detector 0.8
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] lockdep: annotate mm/slab.c
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] lockdep: annotate mm/slab.c
- Index(es):
 |