* Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Any suggestions of how to avoid the parameter passing? (without ugly
> > #ifdeffery)
>
> No, I don't see a way apart from inlining __cache_free(), or inlining
> cache_free_alien() into both kfree() and kmem_cache_free(), both of
> which are unattractive.
furthermore, cache_free_alien() is a NOP on non-NUMA, so the cost on
non-NUMA is really small.
but ... i think gcc ought to be able to figure out that the parameter is
totally unused on !LOCKDEP - all functions involved are static, and we
are using -funit-at-a-time already. That should make the parameter
passing totally zero-cost.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]