On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> But looking at it, I think it's a bit confused. The patch needs
> s/DISABLE_TSC/ENABLE_TSC/ to make it right.
No, SECCOMP_DISABLE_TSC _enables_ the "disable TSC" feature.
Rather confusing naming, I'd agree.
That said, I still think the code is crap, and that if we want to support
tasks that don't have access to the TSC, we should make that an
independent feature of anything like SECCOMP.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]