Re: [PATCH] Use uname not sysctl to get the kernel revision

Jakub Jelinek wrote:

On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 12:33:56PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:

Roland McGrath wrote:

We could also put the uname info (modulo nodename) into the vDSO.

Or even better: real topology information.


AND rather than OR would be even better.  So glibc could find kernel
version, etc. and topology in the vDSO cheaply.

Wouldn't it make more sense for this to be in ELF tags, rather than thevdso? Another alternative, I guess, would be to put a pointer in theELF tags, which may point into the vdso.


	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Use uname not sysctl to get the kernel revision
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Use uname not sysctl to get the kernel revision
  - From: Roland McGrath <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Use uname not sysctl to get the kernel revision
  - From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Use uname not sysctl to get the kernel revision
  - From: Jakub Jelinek <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] Re: Magic Alt-SysRq change in 2.6.18-rc1
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86: Don't randomize stack unless current->personality permits it
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Use uname not sysctl to get the kernel revision
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Use uname not sysctl to get the kernel revision
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]