> this does not have to be a false positive!
> It is not legal to take ANY non-hardirq safe lock after having taken a
> lock that's used in hardirq context.
> (having said that the skb_queue_tail lock needs a special treatment for
> some real false positives; Linus merged that already)
...
> Now this assumes your queue is shared with the networking stack,
Right, understood -- but ipoib has a private skb queue. Which is why
I said it was a false positive.
Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
