Re: annoying frequent overcurrent messages.

["Ray Lee" <madrabbit@gmail.com>]

On 7/12/06, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Ray Lee wrote:
>
> > On 7/12/06, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > > Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > I have a box that's having its dmesg flooded with..
> > > >
> > > > hub 1-0:1.0: over-current change on port 1
> > > > hub 1-0:1.0: over-current change on port 2
> > > > hub 1-0:1.0: over-current change on port 1
> > > > hub 1-0:1.0: over-current change on port 2
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > over and over again..
> > > > The thing is, this box doesn't even have any USB devices connected to it,
> > > > so there's absolutely nothing I can do to remedy this.
> > >
> > > Since you're not using the UHCI controller on that computer, you could
> > > simply rmmod uhci-hcd (or modify /etc/modprobe.conf to prevent it from
> > > being loaded in the first place).  That would stop the constant interrupts
> > > and the syslog spamming.
> >
> > For the syslog spamming, you could jus emit the message once when the
> > state is first noticed, then emit a everything good message when it
> > clears up. There's no need to log it repeatedly during the problem
> > period.
>
> That's almost exactly how the driver behaves currently -- the message is
> printed just once when the state is first noticed.  Nothing is printed
> when the state is cleared, and nothing gets printed repeatedly during the
> problem period.  But then the problem recurs very quickly.

Then the logging of the 'all cleared up' message would be better if it
had a bit of hysteresis to it -- the good state is noticed, but don't
log it as such until it hangs out there for a while and has had a
chance to quiesce.

Ray
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/