On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 09:10 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:27:39 +0200
> Martin Peschke <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +#define statistic_ptr(stat, cpu) \
> > + ((struct percpu_data*)((stat)->data))->ptrs[(cpu)]
>
> This would be the only part of the kernel which uses percpu_data directly -
> everything else uses the APIs (ie: per_cpu_ptr()). How come?
The API, i.e. per_cpu_ptr(), doesn't allow to assign a value to any of
the pointers in struct percpu_data. I need that capability because I
make use of cpu hotplug notifications to fix per-cpu data at run time.
With regard to memory footprint this is much more efficient than using
alloc_percpu().
Is it be preferable to add something like set_per_cpu_ptr() to the API?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
