Re: [patch] do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y

On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 15:32 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Probably not. This (very dirty) hack implements that (with some level
> of success -- ifconfig down/ifconfig up is enough to get wireless
> working).

You just need to

$ iwpriv ethX reset

Thanks,
-yi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y
  - From: "John W. Linville" <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch] do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y
  - From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y
  - From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y
  - From: Michael Buesch <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y
  - From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/6] PCI-Express AER implemetation
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386 kexec: Allow the kexec on panic support to compile on voyager.
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y
Next by thread: Re: [patch] do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]