Re: [GIT *] Remove inclusion of obsolete <linux/config.h>

> Well, it is probably unnecessary to include config.h for about eight 
> months, but as it is not present in feature-removal-schedule.txt I've 
> missed it.  Thanks for pointing it out...
Obsoleting a header is not a "feature-removal" per se.

> FYI, fortunately (for you, unfortunately for VMware) 2.6.18's already broke 
> our build script due to UTS_RELEASE being moved to separate file, so from 
> VMware's viewpoint killconfig.h.git will not do any additional damage...
#include <linux/config.h>
#ifndef UTS_RELEASE
#include <linux/utsrelease.h>
#endif

Then one can wonder why WMware needs UTS_RELEASE?

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [GIT *] Remove inclusion of obsolete <linux/config.h>
    • From: Petr Vandrovec <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [GIT *] Remove inclusion of obsolete <linux/config.h>
    • From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
  • Re: [GIT *] Remove inclusion of obsolete <linux/config.h>
    • From: Petr Vandrovec <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm 5/7] add user namespace
• Next by Date: Re: please revert kthread from loop.c
• Previous by thread: Re: [GIT *] Remove inclusion of obsolete <linux/config.h>
• Next by thread: Re: [GIT *] Remove inclusion of obsolete <linux/config.h>
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]