Re: [GIT *] Remove inclusion of obsolete <linux/config.h>

> Well, it is probably unnecessary to include config.h for about eight 
> months, but as it is not present in feature-removal-schedule.txt I've 
> missed it.  Thanks for pointing it out...
Obsoleting a header is not a "feature-removal" per se.

> FYI, fortunately (for you, unfortunately for VMware) 2.6.18's already broke 
> our build script due to UTS_RELEASE being moved to separate file, so from 
> VMware's viewpoint killconfig.h.git will not do any additional damage...
#include <linux/config.h>
#ifndef UTS_RELEASE
#include <linux/utsrelease.h>
#endif

Then one can wonder why WMware needs UTS_RELEASE?

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [GIT *] Remove inclusion of obsolete <linux/config.h>
  - From: Petr Vandrovec <[email protected]>

References:
- [GIT *] Remove inclusion of obsolete <linux/config.h>
  - From: David Woodhouse <[email protected]>
- Re: [GIT *] Remove inclusion of obsolete <linux/config.h>
  - From: Petr Vandrovec <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm 5/7] add user namespace
Next by Date: Re: please revert kthread from loop.c
Previous by thread: Re: [GIT *] Remove inclusion of obsolete <linux/config.h>
Next by thread: Re: [GIT *] Remove inclusion of obsolete <linux/config.h>
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]