Cedric Le Goater wrote:
How's that ?
int execvef(int flags, const char *filename, char *const argv [], char
*const envp[]);
initially, flags would be :
#define EXECVEF_NEWNS 0x00000100
#define EXECVEF_NEWIPC 0x00000200
#define EXECVEF_NEWUTS 0x00000400
#define EXECVEF_NEWUSER 0x00000800
execvef() would behave like execve() if flags == 0 and would return EINVAL
if flags is invalid. unshare of a namespace can fail and usually returns
ENOMEM.
To be more specific, I guess, what I'm proposing is:
int execxveat(int flags, int dirfd, const char *filename,
char * const *argv, char * const *envp);
... with the -x- for the flags field; that can be dropped since it's
already established that -at() variants can take additional flags.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
