On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 13:57 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> Please don't use a weak attribute, and instead use the same
> "__HAVE_ARCH_FOO" cpp test scheme used for the other string
> operations to allow a platform to override the default
> implementation in lib/string.x
I'm a bit confused.
The last time I tried submitting a patch that followed that style (for
__iowrite_copy*), it got NAKed for propagating preprocessor abuse (Linus
roundly flamed someone for a similar patch a few weeks before I
submitted mine), and Andrew suggested that I use the same scheme that
this patch uses.
So whose instructions do I follow? Yours of today, or Andrew's and
Linus's of a few months ago?
<b
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
