Re: [patch] do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y

Michael Buesch wrote:

Yes. We have a PROM that is readable without firmware.
(And we actually do this and did it forever. So I don't know
where your assumption comes from ;) )

It wasn't an assumption: I was stating something about the Intel cards. It is not possible to determine the MAC address for ipw2100/ipw2200 until the firmware is loaded.

Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y
    • From: Michael Buesch <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y
    • From: Daniel Drake <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y
    • From: Michael Buesch <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] net48xx LED cleanups
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add memcpy_cachebypass, a copy routine that tries to keep cache pressure down
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch] do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] do not allow IPW_2100=Y or IPW_2200=Y
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]