Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.17.3 (What is the next step?)

Ar Maw, 2006-07-11 am 09:28 -0400, ysgrifennodd Justin Piszcz:
> Alan/Jeff/Mark,
> 
> Is there anything else I can do to further troubleshoot this problem now 
> that we have the failed opcode(s)?  Again, there is never any corruption 
> on these drives, so it is more of an annoyance than anything else.

Nothing strikes me so far other than the data not making sense. Possibly
it will become clearer later if/when we see other examples.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.17.3 (What is the next step?)
    • From: David Greaves <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
  • Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
    • From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
  • Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
    • From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
  • Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4
    • From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
  • Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
    • From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
  • Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
    • From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
  • Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
    • From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
  • Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
    • From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
  • Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
    • From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
  • Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
    • From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>
  • LibPATA code issues / 2.6.17.3 (What is the next step?)
    • From: Justin Piszcz <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] let CONFIG_SECCOMP default to n
• Next by Date: RE: oops in current -git
• Previous by thread: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.17.3 (What is the next step?)
• Next by thread: Re: LibPATA code issues / 2.6.17.3 (What is the next step?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]