Re: [PATCH -mm 2/7] add execns syscall to s390

On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 16:44 +0200, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> Thanks !
> 
> Both patches are in my patchset now which compiles and boots fine on s390x.
> I'll build 32 bits binaries to try them.
> 
> Why did you protect sys32_execns, sys_execns and compat_do_execns () with
> #ifdef CONFIG_UTS_NS ? Did you need to ?

Yes, without the #ifdefs I get compile time warnings.

-- 
blue skies,
  Martin.

Martin Schwidefsky
Linux for zSeries Development & Services
IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH -mm 2/7] add execns syscall to s390
    • From: Cedric Le Goater <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH -mm 0/7] execns syscall and user namespace
    • From: Cedric Le Goater <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH -mm 2/7] add execns syscall to s390
    • From: Cedric Le Goater <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH -mm 2/7] add execns syscall to s390
    • From: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH -mm 2/7] add execns syscall to s390
    • From: Cedric Le Goater <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: Commenting out out_of_memory() function in __alloc_pages()
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] srcu-3: RCU variant permitting read-side blocking
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm 2/7] add execns syscall to s390
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm 2/7] add execns syscall to s390
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]