RE: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Allow all Opteron processors to change pstate at same time

> Customers in the field seem to want to use TSC for gtod,
> so I want to know how awful an idea that is.

in userspace or in the kernel? And do you happen to know why they don't
want to use hpet?

Greetings,
    Arjan van de Ven

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Allow all Opteron processors to change pstate at same time
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

References:
- RE: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Allow all Opteron processors to change pstate at same time
  - From: "Langsdorf, Mark" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] i386 adds smp_call_function_single
Next by Date: [2.6 patch] arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c: no need to set isa_bridge
Previous by thread: RE: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Allow all Opteron processors to change pstate at same time
Next by thread: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Allow all Opteron processors to change pstate at same time
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]