Ar Llu, 2006-07-10 am 22:16 -0400, ysgrifennodd Jon Smirl: > I'm not looking for performance gains, I'm looking more to isolate the > tty code down to a minimal set of interactions with the rest of the > kernel. RIght now it is all intertwined. That might be tricky given that hangup and SAK have to directly interact with the VFS locking. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tty's use of file_list_lock and file_move
- From: "Jon Smirl" <[email protected]>
- Re: tty's use of file_list_lock and file_move
- References:
- tty's use of file_list_lock and file_move
- From: "Jon Smirl" <[email protected]>
- Re: tty's use of file_list_lock and file_move
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: tty's use of file_list_lock and file_move
- From: "Jon Smirl" <[email protected]>
- Re: tty's use of file_list_lock and file_move
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: tty's use of file_list_lock and file_move
- From: "Jon Smirl" <[email protected]>
- Re: tty's use of file_list_lock and file_move
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: tty's use of file_list_lock and file_move
- From: "Jon Smirl" <[email protected]>
- Re: tty's use of file_list_lock and file_move
- From: "Jon Smirl" <[email protected]>
- Re: tty's use of file_list_lock and file_move
- From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- Re: tty's use of file_list_lock and file_move
- From: "Jon Smirl" <[email protected]>
- tty's use of file_list_lock and file_move
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ia64: change usermode HZ to 250
- Next by Date: Re: [Patch 6/6] per task delay accounting taskstats interface: fix clone skbs for each listener
- Previous by thread: Re: tty's use of file_list_lock and file_move
- Next by thread: Re: tty's use of file_list_lock and file_move
- Index(es):
 |