On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 18:37 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 17:04 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> >
> >
> >>No, I didn't quite mean a manual touch, but a system call to "close and
> >>set time to high resolution" for files where time uniformity is
> >>important. Consider that in most cases the inodes times are set by the
> >>host machine clock, which I close the change reflects the fileserving
> >>host idea of time. If there were a call to close a file and set the
> >>times like touch, then that could be used, for both local and network files.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Close should never update the time since that would be a violation of
> >POSIX rules. Normally, an NFS client will never need to update the time:
> >RPC calls like WRITE, READ and SETATTR will automatically do it for us
> >whenever necessary.
> >
> >
>
> Let me restate this a third time in another way. What I suggest is a
> system call, NOT NAMED CLOSE, which does a close and touch. This was all
> blue sky discussion, new system calls are as valid as nanosecond
> resolution and syncronization between servers. Since this is a new call
> it is not specified by POSIX.
>
> And Linus has already suggested that he would accept something similar,
> when I proposed something like "noatime" mounts, which only updated
> atime and mtime on open and close, to keep metadata relevant but not
> have the overhead of constant updates.
>
> Actually, now that I have more free time I may revisit that idea.
Linus might accept it, but I won't. It is totally unnecessary.
Cheers,
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
