Re: [PATCH 1/2] batch-write.patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jul 05, 2006  21:58 -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Reiser4, FUSE, maybe XFS, and GFS2.  Andreas, your support had
> conditions, so I will not characterize for you whether you said Lustre
> or you would like it.  Andreas, could you look at the patch and see what
> you think?

Lustre definitely wants to be able to aggregate IOs into larger chunks
wherever possible.  Having interfaces that allow this instead of going
through page-at-a-time interfaces is definitely a win.  As it stands
now we have to avoid the VFS or otherwise have back-channel information
in order to ensure that large IOs remain large.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux