On Monday 10 July 2006 22:27, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> >
> >> Hmm... Actually we could leave __GFP_HIGHMEM at it prior value since
> >> GFP_ZONEMASK masks it out anyways. Need to test this though. This may
> >> also make some of the __GFP_DMA32 ifdefs unnecessary.
> >
> > Here is the patch that fixes __GFP_DMA32 and __GFP_HIGHMEM to always
> > be nonzero. However, after the #ifdef in my last patch there is no
> > remaining instance of this left. The cure here adds some complexity:
>
> My 2.6.18-rc1-mm1 is now much more friendly with the last 2 patches.
Confirmed.
Thanks,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
