On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:37:33AM -0400, Michael Krufky wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> >Is it still okay to submit patches for 2.6.16-stable? I guess "dirty
> >buffers flushing broken after resume" may count...
> > Pavel
> >
> >
> I was under the impression that 2.6.16.y was staying open for a much
> longer time, as per Adrian's "2.6.16 long living kernel" announcement a
> short while back.
>
> I just assumed that the Greg and Chris were handling it until 2.6.18
> gets released, and then Adrian takes over 2.6.16.y while the [stable]
> team moves on to 2.6.17.y and 2.6.18.y ... Was this an incorrect
> assumption?
Greg told me they want to make one last 2.6.16.y release.
Greg and Chris don't maintain two series that long - check the date of
the last 2.6.15.y release.
> ...and if not, should 2.6.16.y patches always be sent to
> [email protected], or will Adrian have an alternate method for accepting
> patches?
This is among the small technical issues that have to be discussed and
solved.
> -Mike
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
