Re: 2.6.18-rc1-mm1 oops on x86_64

[Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>]

On Sun, 9 Jul 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 18:19:00 +0200
> Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.18-rc1/2.6.18-rc1-mm1/
> > 
> > Kernel BUG at ...home/legoater/linux/2.6.18-rc1-mm1/mm/page_alloc.c:252
> 
> 	VM_BUG_ON((gfp_flags & (__GFP_WAIT | __GFP_HIGHMEM)) == __GFP_HIGHMEM);
> 
> With your config, __GFP_HIGHMEM=0, so wham.

Hmm.. What this should be then is

VM_BUG_ON(gfp_flags & __GFP_WAIT)

in case of !CONFIG_HIGHMEM

So (not that nice though...)


Index: linux-2.6.17-mm6/mm/page_alloc.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.17-mm6.orig/mm/page_alloc.c	2006-07-07 16:51:50.430063305 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.17-mm6/mm/page_alloc.c	2006-07-10 08:53:40.733541907 -0700
@@ -255,7 +255,11 @@ static inline void prep_zero_page(struct
 {
 	int i;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
 	VM_BUG_ON((gfp_flags & (__GFP_WAIT | __GFP_HIGHMEM)) == __GFP_HIGHMEM);
+#else
+	VM_BUG_ON((gfp_flags & __GFP_WAIT);
+#endif
 	/*
 	 * clear_highpage() will use KM_USER0, so it's a bug to use __GFP_ZERO
 	 * and __GFP_HIGHMEM from hard or soft interrupt context.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/