Jon Smirl wrote:
> On 7/10/06, Alan Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Ar Llu, 2006-07-10 am 09:03 -0400, ysgrifennodd Jon Smirl:
>> > I agree with this. I made a mistake with the pts vs pty, why not just
>> > help me fix the mistake instead of rejecting everything? Some the of
>> > the info being reported in /proc/tty/drivers is wrong (vc./0 - from
>> > the devfs attempt?). or missing.
>>
>> What are you trying to achieve and where are you trying to get. If you
>> want better info for the tty layer then get the new info working in
>> sysfs first. Then when people are generally using sysfs you can worry
>> about cleaning up/removing/breaking the old stuff.
>>
>
> Before the change /proc/tty/drivers shows this:
>
> [jonsmirl@jonsmirl ~]$ cat /proc/tty/drivers
> /dev/tty /dev/tty 5 0 system:/dev/tty
> /dev/console /dev/console 5 1 system:console
> /dev/ptmx /dev/ptmx 5 2 system
> /dev/vc/0 /dev/vc/0 4 0 system:vtmaster
vtmaster was /dev/tty0 in 2.2.x, changed to /dev/vc/0 probably
because of devfs. I would tend to agree with the change of at least
this part.
A few apps do rely on /proc/tty/drivers for the major-minor
to device name mapping. /dev/vc/0 does not exist (unless
created manually) without devfs.
Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]