> > Just do /proc/*/tty links and all will be good. This even > handles the case of two different names for the same dev_t. > Is this for the controlling tty? Then it should be ctty. Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Opinions on removing /proc/tty?
- From: "Albert Cahalan" <[email protected]>
- Re: Opinions on removing /proc/tty?
- References:
- Re: Opinions on removing /proc/tty?
- From: "Albert Cahalan" <[email protected]>
- Re: Opinions on removing /proc/tty?
- From: "Jon Smirl" <[email protected]>
- Re: Opinions on removing /proc/tty?
- From: "Albert Cahalan" <[email protected]>
- Re: Opinions on removing /proc/tty?
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: Opinions on removing /proc/tty?
- From: "Albert Cahalan" <[email protected]>
- Re: Opinions on removing /proc/tty?
- From: Russell King <[email protected]>
- Re: Opinions on removing /proc/tty?
- From: "Albert Cahalan" <[email protected]>
- Re: Opinions on removing /proc/tty?
- Prev by Date: Follow up? LibPATA code issues / 2.6.15.4 (found the opcode=0x35)!
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Clean up old names in tty code to current names
- Previous by thread: Re: Opinions on removing /proc/tty?
- Next by thread: Re: Opinions on removing /proc/tty?
- Index(es):
 |