On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 02:37:58 -0700
Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:03:25 +0200
> Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I've put up an updated patch at
> > http://avr32linux.org/twiki/pub/Main/LinuxPatches/avr32-arch-3.patch
>
> That diff doesn't update ./MAINTAINERS
Crap, I can't belive I left that out two times in a row...
> Please prepare a nice changelog describing the architecture (what's an
> avr?), who supports it, useful web pages, how to build cross-tools,
> etc. The sort of things which Linus and kernel developers should know
> when someone sends in a half-megabyte patch.
>
> And a signed-off-by:, as per section 11 of
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
Updated patch with MAINTAINERS, a much longer changelog entry and
Signed-off-by:
http://avr32linux.org/twiki/pub/Main/LinuxPatches/avr32-arch-4.patch
By the way, there's a separate patch #ifdef'ing out /dev/port available
from the same LinuxPatches page. Should I fold it into the avr32-arch
patch? I don't consider this a permanent solution anyway, so I made it
a separate patch in order to drop it more easily when we actually
implement port-based I/O...
Thanks,
Håvard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
